Support independent, student-run journalism.

Your support helps give staff members from all backgrounds the opportunity to conduct meaningful reporting on important issues at Stanford. All contributions are tax-deductible.

Court declines review of sentences based on acquitted conduct

The case may also be another opportunity for debate about the appropriateness of the sentencing practices broadly to come to the forefront. While courts have long limited or avoided the question of constitutional rights at most sentencing, this most recent wave of cases, led by Jones, might just usher in a new era of sentencing scrutiny. Or at least that’s what it seems the three dissenters might have in mind. But for now, it appears they will have to wait for another day.