Tweets by @Stanford_Daily

RT @StanfordSports: Our recap of Stanford's 45-0 win. Key takeways: McCaffrey has a bright future and the O-line still needs to gel http://…: 2 days ago, The Stanford Daily
RT @StanfordSports: And that's the ballgame. Stanford routs UC-Davis 45-0.: 2 days ago, The Stanford Daily
Suspect "described as a white male adult, in his 30's, approx. 5' 7" and 140 lbs., fit build with short brown hair and wearing black shorts": 3 days ago, The Stanford Daily
Alert: "A female adult reported that she was...struck from behind with an unknown object that she believed to be a stick.": 3 days ago, The Stanford Daily
AlertSU system reporting a physical assault nearby Palm Drive and Campus Drive at 9:11 p.m.: 3 days ago, The Stanford Daily

OPINIONS

Letter to the editor: The Medical-Government Complex

To the Editor:

The state of medicine described in “A Golden Age of Mental Health,” by Professor Keith Humphreys (Opinions Section, March 7, 2014), is deeply troubling. I do not mean this to suggest we should return to a world of lobotomies and institutions. But the public policy-assisted expansion of the mental health industry cannot be used to show progress in society’s health at large.

The philosopher Ivan Illich played provocateur in 1975 when he asserted that the greatest threat to health is, in fact, modern medicine. Today, in the U.S. alone, hospital-associated infections contribute to almost 100,000 deaths a year. But the relationship between medicine and illness becomes even more worrying when discussing mental health.

The last decade has seen an unprecedented expansion of the mental health-industrial complex, including exponential increases in bipolar disorder diagnoses and the official inclusion of dozens of questionable diagnosable disorders like “internet gaming disorder.” Every Stanford student, it seems, either has an Adderall prescription or knows someone who does.

Thanks to some of the policies described by Dr. Humphreys, I know that a lot more people who need help are getting it. But instead of celebrating the forces that make up the “public policy revolution,” I suggest that government is the least credible candidate to lead the mental health fight. The scourge of corporate lobbyists that pervades Washington is well-documented: In 2008, the top recipients of pharmaceutical industry donations was a veritable who’s who of top Obamacare negotiators.

What used to be called growing pains and mood swings are now symptoms of ADHD and dizzying arrays of prefix-modified menopauses. Increasing numbers of people consume an increasing number of drugs to cure increasingly complicated, unobservable ailments. It’s hard to say that society is the biggest winner. We can say, though, that the business of mental health has never been more profitable.

Is this the “golden age” of mental health? Or have we reached a threshold of mental health medicalization that is doing more harm than good? Most importantly, does society have the power to disrupt industry-led, government-complicit forces of mental health medicalization?

We know what Ivan Illich would say. His Medical Nemesis, some four decades old, is in hindsight clearly avant-garde.

“A placebo—Latin for ‘I will, please’—pleases not only the patient, but the administering physician as well.”

Edward Ngai ’15 was formerly president and editor in chief of The Stanford Daily.

Contact Edward Ngai at edngai@stanford.edu.

About Edward Ngai

Edward Ngai is a senior staff writer at The Stanford Daily. Previously, he has worked as a news desk editor, staff development editor and columnist. He was president and editor-in-chief of The Daily for Vol. 244 (2013-2014). Edward is a junior from Vancouver, Canada studying political science. This summer, he is the Daniel Pearl Memorial Intern at the Wall Street Journal.