By Ariel Liu
In its last meeting of winter quarter, the 49th Faculty Senate briefly addressed the Trump administration’s newly revised executive order on immigration, passed a resolution in support of liberal arts education and previewed the freshman year report.
Although he called President Donald Trump’s new executive order a “scaled back version” of its January predecessor, Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne cited a wide range of services still available to those affected by the travel ban including counseling services, financial aid services and travel guidance.
“Our sense is that the new executive order will likely cause less immediate disruption to our community than the first executive order,” Tessier-Lavigne said. “[However,] we continue to be very concerned about the overall message of unwelcome that’s conveyed by these orders.”
He reaffirmed support for undocumented students, confirming that Stanford “does not make the [immigration] status of people known or available to the authorities.”
Tessier-Lavigne added that Stanford “continues to communicate with officials at the federal level” and reiterated previously stated reasons for not adopting the “sanctuary campus” label for Stanford.
“There is no clear definition of what a sanctuary means beyond the specific actions that we already said that we will or will not take,” Tessier-Lavigne said. “If you put a target on your back, you invite scrutiny and put members of our population at risk.”
Following Tessier-Lavigne’s statement, Russell Berman, chair of the Policy and Planning Board (PPB) and Walter A. Haas Professor in the Humanities, presented the PPB’s report on the status of liberal education at Stanford.
A debate escalated over the definition of the word “liberal” and whether it is still generally understood to mean “willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one’s own,” as the Oxford English Dictionary states.
Berman pointed to better academic and professional advising as a key strategy to encourage students to explore more interests.
“If we do not have [improved advising], then student culture will be the main factor in influencing whether students choose a vocational major or an intellectual passion,” Berman said. “If students see intellectual passion in a vocational major, then that’s great. But no student should feel that Stanford isn’t a home for the pursuit of their passion.”
Berman hopes that underclassmen will be encouraged to explore more academically in their earlier years at Stanford rather than feel pressured to take introductory classes for their majors.
Berman said Stanford also plans to offer freshmen seminars during the summer. While the seminars will be open to everyone, their goal is to allow more athletes who are on campus during the summer to take advantage of the courses when they have greater flexibility in their schedules.
Sarah Church, senior associate vice provost for undergraduate education and professor of physics, gave an interim report on the freshman year and broke down her committee’s findings into key categories: health and wellbeing, academic choices and culture and, finally, equity and inclusion.
While the full report will not be completed until the end of the year, Church provided a summary of its findings.
“First year students regard the choices they make as having very high stakes,” Church said. “Many of them are concerned that if they don’t make the right choice, they won’t be able to find a good job— they won’t be able to have the life they want.”
Contact Ariel Liu at aliu15 ‘at’ stanford.edu.