judicial affairs

No Free Lunch: It’s Hard to Write About the Good Things

If you’ve followed our column over the past few months, you’ve probably noticed that we’re somewhat critical of several aspects of Stanford. We’ve tried to weigh in on the most controversial topics on campus, but as the joke goes about the liberal/conservative divide in Synergy being drawn around paper towels, conflicts on campus are on relatively few fringe questions.

May 23 | Comments (0)

No Free Lunch: Toward a Real Student-Run Honor Code

Last week, on the advice on the U.S. Justice Department, President Hennessey’s office unilaterally lowered the standard of proof in Judicial Affairs cases involving sexual assault from “beyond a reasonable doubt” to “a preponderance of the evidence.” While some might be frustrated that he failed to consult the student body in making this change, it’s altogether understandable; President Hennessey is responsible for a large check from the federal government that’s contingent on complying with it’s edicts.

Apr 25 | Comments (0)

Op-Ed: Standard of Proof

On April 12, President Hennessy released an executive order to lower the standard of proof from “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” to “Preponderance of the Evidence” in cases on sexual assault and relationship abuse. The decision came on the heels of Vice President Biden’s stern call to U.S. universities to better account for campus sexual violence.

Apr 18 | Comments (0)

Page 1 of 3123

Login to your account

Can't remember your Password ?

Register for this site!